Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, we may earn commissions from qualifying Amazon.com purchases

Wrangler Vs Bronco MPG: A Fuel Efficiency Comparison

Get the inside scoop on the fuel efficiency of the Jeep Wrangler and Ford Bronco, including city, highway, and combined MPG ratings, and how different engine options and trim levels affect fuel economy.

Fuel Efficiency Comparison

When it comes to choosing between the Wrangler and Bronco, one of the most critical factors to consider is fuel efficiency. After all, who doesn’t want to save money on gas and reduce their carbon footprint? In this section, we’ll delve into the nitty-gritty of fuel efficiency, exploring the city, highway, and combined MPG ratings of these two iconic vehicles.

City MPG Ratings

Let’s start with city driving, where stop-and-go traffic and congested roads can put a real dent in your fuel efficiency. The good news is that both the Wrangler and Bronco offer respectable city MPG ratings. The Wrangler, for instance, boasts an estimated 17 MPG city rating for the 2-door model and 18 MPG city for the 4-door Unlimited trim. The Bronco, on the other hand, comes in at an estimated 18 MPG city for the 2-door and 19 MPG city for the 4-door. While these numbers may not blow you away, they’re certainly competitive considering the size and power of these vehicles.

Highway MPG Ratings

Now, let’s shift gears and take a look at highway MPG ratings. This is where the Wrangler and Bronco really start to shine, with both vehicles offering impressive fuel efficiency on the open road. The Wrangler’s 2-door model boasts an estimated 23 MPG highway, while the 4-door Unlimited trim comes in at 22 MPG highway. The Bronco, meanwhile, offers an estimated 20 MPG highway for the 2-door and 21 MPG highway for the 4-door. Whether you’re commuting to work or embarking on a road trip, these numbers are sure to put a smile on your face.

Combined MPG Estimates

So, what about combined MPG estimates? This is where we get a sense of a vehicle’s overall fuel efficiency, factoring in both city and highway driving. The Wrangler’s 2-door model comes in at an estimated 20 MPG combined, while the 4-door Unlimited trim boasts an estimated 21 MPG combined. The Bronco, meanwhile, offers an estimated 20 MPG combined for the 2-door and 21 MPG combined for the 4-door. As you can see, both vehicles offer solid combined MPG estimates, making them a great choice for anyone looking to save on gas without sacrificing power and performance.


Engine Options and MPG

When it comes to choosing between the Wrangler and Bronco, one crucial factor to consider is the engine options and their corresponding MPG ratings. After all, the right engine can make all the difference in your overall driving experience. So, let’s dive into the details and explore what these two iconic vehicles have to offer.

Wrangler’s Pentastar V6 MPG

The Wrangler’s Pentastar V6 engine is a beast of an engine that packs a punch. With a displacement of 3.6 liters, it produces a whopping 285 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque. But how does it fare when it comes to fuel efficiency? Well, the answer is – not bad at all! The Wrangler’s V6 engine returns an estimated 17 MPG in the city, 23 MPG on the highway, and a combined rating of 19 MPG. Not too shabby for a vehicle that’s designed to tackle the rough stuff.

Bronco’s EcoBoost Engine MPG

The Bronco, on the other hand, boasts an impressive EcoBoost engine that’s designed to provide both power and efficiency. With a displacement of 2.7 liters, it produces a respectable 310 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque. But what about its MPG ratings? The Bronco’s EcoBoost engine returns an estimated 18 MPG in the city, 22 MPG on the highway, and a combined rating of 20 MPG. That’s a slight edge over the Wrangler’s V6 engine, but we’ll get to that later.

Diesel Engine Options for Both

Now, you might be wondering – what about diesel engine options for these two vehicles? Well, the good news is that both the Wrangler and Bronco offer diesel engine options, albeit with some caveats. The Wrangler’s 3.0-liter EcoDiesel V6 engine, for instance, returns an estimated 22 MPG in the city, 29 MPG on the highway, and a combined rating of 25 MPG. The Bronco, on the other hand, offers a 3.0-liter Power Stroke Turbo Diesel engine that returns an estimated 21 MPG in the city, 26 MPG on the highway, and a combined rating of 23 MPG. Not bad at all, especially if you’re planning to do some serious off-roading or hauling.


Transmission and Drivetrain Impact

When it comes to the Wrangler vs Bronco mpg debate, many enthusiasts tend to overlook the significant role that transmission and drivetrain play in fuel efficiency. But, can these components really make a notable difference in your vehicle’s gas mileage? Let’s dive in and explore the intricacies of transmission and drivetrain impact on mpg.

Automatic vs Manual Transmission MPG

The age-old debate between automatic and manual transmissions has sparked intense discussions among car enthusiasts. In the context of mpg, the question is, does the type of transmission really matter? The answer is, yes, it does. Automatic transmissions, with their complex gear-shifting mechanisms, tend to guzzle more fuel than their manual counterparts. This is because automatics require more energy to power the transmission itself, which translates to higher fuel consumption. On the other hand, manual transmissions allow drivers to have greater control over gear shifts, enabling more efficient fuel use. According to various studies, manual transmissions can improve mpg by up to 5% compared to automatics.

4-Wheel Drive System Efficiency

Four-wheel drive (4WD) systems are a hallmark of both the Wrangler and Bronco, providing unparalleled off-road capability. However, this feature comes at a cost – literally. 4WD systems demand more energy to power the additional wheels, axles, and differentials, resulting in decreased fuel efficiency. But, how much of an impact does 4WD really have on mpg? The answer lies in the type of 4WD system employed. Part-time 4WD systems, like those found in the Wrangler, tend to be more fuel-efficient than full-time systems, which continuously send power to all four wheels. In contrast, the Bronco’s advanced 4WD system, featuring a two-speed electromechanical transfer case, is designed to optimize fuel efficiency while maintaining impressive off-road prowess.

Rear-Wheel Drive MPG Benefits

Rear-wheel drive (RWD) vehicles, like the Wrangler, often get a bad rap when it comes to fuel efficiency. The common misconception is that RWD systems are inherently less efficient than their 4WD or all-wheel drive (AWD) counterparts. However, this couldn’t be further from the truth. In reality, RWD systems can provide significant mpg benefits, particularly in scenarios where four-wheel traction isn’t necessary. With less complexity and fewer components, RWD systems reduce energy losses, resulting in improved fuel efficiency. According to various studies, RWD vehicles can achieve up to 10% better mpg in ideal driving conditions compared to their 4WD or AWD counterparts.


Trim Level and Package Effects

When it comes to the Wrangler vs Bronco MPG debate, one crucial factor to consider is the trim level and package effects. You might wonder, “How do different trim levels and packages impact fuel efficiency?” Let’s dive in to find out.

Base Model MPG vs Top Trims

The base model of both the Wrangler and Bronco usually offers the best MPG ratings. This is because they typically come with fewer features, lighter weights, and more fuel-efficient engines. For instance, the base Wrangler Sport trim has an estimated 21 MPG combined, while the top-of-the-line Rubicon trim has an estimated 18 MPG combined. The same pattern applies to the Bronco, with the base model offering better fuel economy than the higher trims. This raises an important question: Are the added features and capabilities of higher trims worth the sacrifice in fuel efficiency?

Off-Road Packages and MPG

Off-road packages, such as the Wrangler’s Rubicon trim or the Bronco’s Badlands trim, often come with features like larger tires, higher ground clearance, and more aggressive suspension. While these features enhance off-road capability, they can also decrease fuel efficiency. The added weight, increased aerodynamic drag, and altered suspension geometry all contribute to lower MPG ratings. However, for those who prioritize off-road adventure, the trade-off might be well worth it. After all, who needs great fuel economy when you’re crawling over rocks or fording streams?

Luxury Packages and Fuel Efficiency

On the other end of the spectrum, luxury packages can also impact fuel efficiency. Features like heated seats, premium stereos, and advanced safety features can add weight and draw more power from the electrical system, ultimately decreasing MPG. However, luxury packages often come with more advanced engine technologies, such as cylinder deactivation or automatic start/stop systems, which can help mitigate the fuel efficiency loss. The question then becomes: Are the comforts and conveniences of luxury packages worth the slight decrease in fuel economy? For many, the answer is a resounding “yes.”