Looking for the perfect compact SUV? Compare the specs of the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V to make an informed decision. Find out which one suits your needs with our in-depth comparison.
Exterior Dimensions
If you’re in the market for a new compact SUV, you’re likely wondering how the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V measure up in terms of exterior dimensions. After all, a vehicle’s size can greatly impact everything from parking and maneuverability to passenger comfort and cargo space. So, let’s dive in and explore the key exterior dimensions of these two popular models.
Length and Width
The Mazda CX-30 boasts a length of 173.0 inches (4,385 mm) and a width of 70.7 inches (1,796 mm). In comparison, the Honda HR-V measures in at 169.1 inches (4,293 mm) in length and 69.8 inches (1,770 mm) in width. While both vehicles are compact in size, the CX-30’s slightly longer and wider stance may appeal to those seeking a more spacious interior.
Height and Wheelbase
When it comes to height, the Honda HR-V stands slightly taller at 63.2 inches (1,604 mm) compared to the CX-30’s 61.7 inches (1,565 mm). However, the CX-30’s wheelbase is longer, measuring 104.8 inches (2,662 mm) to the HR-V’s 102.8 inches (2,610 mm). A longer wheelbase can often translate to a smoother ride and more stable handling, making the CX-30 a compelling choice for those who prioritize on-road comfort.
Ground Clearance and Curb Weight
Rounding out our examination of exterior dimensions, let’s consider ground clearance and curb weight. The Mazda CX-30 features a ground clearance of 6.8 inches (173 mm), while the Honda HR-V offers a slightly higher ground clearance of 7.8 inches (198 mm). In terms of curb weight, the CX-30 tips the scales at 3,143 pounds (1,425 kg) for the base trim, whereas the HR-V weighs in at 2,902 pounds (1,317 kg) for its base model. These differences may impact everything from off-road capability to fuel efficiency, so it’s essential to weigh your needs and priorities carefully.
Engine and Performance
The heart of any vehicle is its engine, and when it comes to the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V, both models boast impressive powertrains that deliver a thrilling driving experience. But how do they stack up against each other?
Engine Type and Horsepower
The Mazda CX-30 comes equipped with a 2.5-liter inline-four cylinder engine that pumps out a respectable 186 horsepower. This naturally aspirated engine is designed to provide a broad power band, making it perfect for city driving and highway cruising. On the other hand, the Honda HR-V features a 1.8-liter inline-four cylinder engine that produces 141 horsepower. While it may not match the CX-30’s horsepower, the HR-V’s engine is praised for its fuel efficiency and smooth power delivery.
Torque and Transmission Options
When it comes to torque, the Mazda CX-30 edges out the Honda HR-V, with 186 lb-ft of torque compared to the HR-V’s 127 lb-ft. This added torque makes the CX-30 feel more responsive and agile, especially when merging onto highways or tackling steep inclines. Both models come with a range of transmission options, including a six-speed automatic transmission and a manual transmission (available on the CX-30’s base trim). The HR-V also offers a continuously variable transmission (CVT) for those who prioritize fuel efficiency.
Fuel Economy and Tank Capacity
Speaking of fuel efficiency, the Honda HR-V has a slight edge over the Mazda CX-30. The HR-V boasts an estimated EPA rating of up to 28 MPG city and 34 MPG highway, compared to the CX-30’s 25 MPG city and 31 MPG highway. However, the CX-30 has a larger fuel tank capacity, holding 13.2 gallons compared to the HR-V’s 12.7 gallons. This means the CX-30 can travel longer distances between fill-ups, making it a great option for road trips.
Interior Features
When it comes to interior features, the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V are designed to provide comfort, convenience, and connectivity. Whether you’re driving solo or with passengers, these subcompact crossovers offer a range of features to enhance your driving experience.
Seating Capacity and Legroom
Both the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V offer seating for up to five passengers, making them ideal for small families or groups of friends. However, the CX-30 has a slight edge when it comes to legroom. With 36.3 inches of rear legroom, the CX-30 provides ample space for passengers to stretch out, while the HR-V offers 34.5 inches. That’s a difference of almost two inches, which can make a big difference on long road trips.
Cargo Space and Storage
When it comes to cargo space, the Honda HR-V has a slight advantage. With 24.3 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seats, the HR-V offers more room for luggage, groceries, or sporting gear. The Mazda CX-30, on the other hand, offers 20.2 cubic feet of cargo space. However, both vehicles feature 60/40 split-folding rear seats, allowing you to customize your cargo space to fit your needs.
Infotainment System and Connectivity
Staying connected on the go is easy with the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V. Both vehicles feature intuitive infotainment systems with touchscreen displays and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto integration. The CX-30’s system is slightly larger, with an 8.8-inch screen compared to the HR-V’s 7-inch screen. Additionally, the CX-30 offers a premium 12-speaker Bose audio system, while the HR-V’s top-of-the-line audio system features six speakers. Both vehicles also offer a range of advanced safety features, including forward collision warning and lane departure warning systems.
Safety Features
When it comes to safety, both the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V have got you covered. After all, what’s the point of a stylish ride if it can’t protect you and your loved ones on the road? In this section, we’ll dive into the airbag count, crash test ratings, and driver-assist technologies that make these vehicles stand out.
Airbag Count and Advanced Safety
The Mazda CX-30 boasts an impressive eight airbags, including dual front, front side, side curtain, and driver’s knee airbags. The Honda HR-V, on the other hand, features a total of six airbags, comprising dual front, front side, and side curtain airbags. While both vehicles offer a decent amount of airbags, the Mazda CX-30 edges out the HR-V in this department.
But it’s not just about the number of airbags; advanced safety features also play a critical role. The Mazda CX-30 comes equipped with a Whiplash-reducing front seat structure, which helps absorb the impact of a collision and reduce the risk of whiplash injuries. The HR-V, meanwhile, features a Multi-Angle Rearview Camera with dynamic guidelines, which provides a clearer view of what’s behind you.
Crash Test Ratings and Security
Both vehicles have undergone rigorous crash testing, and the results are impressive. The Mazda CX-30 has received a perfect 5-star overall safety rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), with 5-star ratings in frontal and side crash tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has also awarded the CX-30 a Top Safety Pick+ rating, the highest honor given by the organization.
The Honda HR-V has also received a 5-star overall safety rating from the NHTSA, with 4- and 5-star ratings in frontal and side crash tests, respectively. The IIHS has awarded the HR-V a Top Safety Pick rating, just one notch below the CX-30’s Top Safety Pick+ rating. While both vehicles have performed well in crash tests, the Mazda CX-30’s perfect scores give it a slight edge in this department.
Driver-Assist Technologies and Sensors
In today’s driving landscape, advanced driver-assist technologies are more important than ever. The Mazda CX-30 features a range of innovative systems, including Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Departure Warning and Lane Keep Assist, and Smart City Brake Support with Pedestrian Detection. These features work together to provide a safer, more convenient driving experience.
The Honda HR-V, meanwhile, offers its own set of driver-assist technologies, including a Collision Mitigation Braking System, Lane Departure Warning, and Road Departure Mitigation System. While both vehicles offer a range of advanced safety features, the Mazda CX-30’s more comprehensive suite of technologies gives it an advantage in this department.
Suspension and Handling
When it comes to suspension and handling, the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V are designed to provide a smooth ride and agile handling. But how do they compare?
Front and Rear Suspension Type
The Mazda CX-30 features an independent front suspension with a MacPherson strut and a torsion beam rear suspension. This setup allows for better weight distribution and improved handling. In contrast, the Honda HR-V has a similar independent front suspension, but its rear suspension is a deformable beam type. While this design is more compact and efficient, it may not provide the same level of handling as the CX-30.
Steering System and Turning Radius
The steering system in the Mazda CX-30 is Electric Power Assisted Steering (EPAS), which provides precise and responsive handling. The CX-30 has a turning radius of 17.4 feet, making it easy to maneuver in tight spaces. The Honda HR-V also features EPAS, but its turning radius is slightly larger at 17.7 feet. While the difference is minor, it’s worth considering if you live in an urban area with narrow streets.
Braking System and Performance
The braking system in the Mazda CX-30 consists of 11.6-inch vented discs in the front and 11.9-inch solid discs in the rear. The CX-30 also features a range of advanced braking technologies, including Smart City Brake Support and Adaptive Cruise Control. The Honda HR-V has a similar braking system, with 11.5-inch vented discs in the front and 11.1-inch solid discs in the rear. However, it lacks some of the advanced braking features found in the CX-30. When it comes to stopping power, both vehicles are capable, but the CX-30 has a slight edge.
Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
Fuel efficiency and emissions are critical aspects to consider when deciding between the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V. In today’s eco-conscious world, it’s essential to know how these compact SUVs perform in terms of fuel economy and environmental impact. Let’s dive into the details to help you make an informed decision.
MPG Ratings and Fuel Type
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V have some similarities and differences. The CX-30 offers an estimated 24-25 MPG in the city, 30-31 MPG on the highway, and 26-27 MPG combined, depending on the trim level and drivetrain. The HR-V, on the other hand, provides an estimated 24-28 MPG in the city, 31-35 MPG on the highway, and 26-30 MPG combined. Both vehicles are available with front-wheel drive (FWD) or all-wheel drive (AWD) configurations, with the AWD models generally compromising on fuel efficiency.
Both SUVs use regular unleaded gasoline, making them convenient for daily driving. However, if you’re looking for a more fuel-efficient option, the HR-V’s top-tier trim, the Touring, offers an estimated 35 MPG on the highway, making it a more attractive choice for those who frequently drive long distances.
Emissions Standards and Ratings
Emissions standards are becoming increasingly stringent, and both the Mazda CX-30 and Honda HR-V comply with the latest regulations. The CX-30 meets the Ultra-Low Emission Vehicle (ULEV) standards, while the HR-V meets the Super Ultra-Low Emission Vehicle (SULEV) standards in certain states. These designations indicate that the vehicles produce significantly fewer emissions than older models.
In terms of emissions ratings, the CX-30 scores 6-7 out of 10 on the EPA’s Green Vehicle Guide, depending on the trim and drivetrain. The HR-V reaches a score of 7-8 out of 10, with the FWD models performing better than their AWD counterparts. While neither vehicle is a zero-emission vehicle, they both demonstrate a commitment to reducing their environmental footprint.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Score
The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Score is a valuable metric for evaluating a vehicle’s environmental impact. This score takes into account the emissions produced during the vehicle’s entire lifecycle, from production to disposal. The Mazda CX-30 earns a score of 5-6 out of 10, while the Honda HR-V scores 6-7 out of 10, depending on the trim and drivetrain.
While these scores may seem abstract, they represent a critical aspect of a vehicle’s eco-friendliness. By choosing a vehicle with a higher Greenhouse Gas Emissions Score, you’re contributing to a cleaner environment and helping to reduce the automotive industry’s carbon footprint.